You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Planning adaptation to climate change in fast-warming marine regions with seafood-dependent coastal communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-016-9419-0 |
| Authors |
Alistair J. Hobday, Kevern Cochrane, Nicola Downey-Breedt, James Howard, Shankar Aswani, Val Byfield, Greg Duggan, Elethu Duna, Leo X. C. Dutra, Stewart D. Frusher, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Louise Gammage, Maria A. Gasalla, Chevon Griffiths, Almeida Guissamulo, Marcus Haward, Astrid Jarre, Sarah M. Jennings, Tia Jordan, Jessica Joyner, Narayana Kumar Ramani, Swathi Lekshmi Perumal Shanmugasundaram, Willem Malherbe, Kelly Ortega Cisneros, Adina Paytan, Gretta T. Pecl, Éva E. Plagányi, Ekaterina E. Popova, Haja Razafindrainibe, Michael Roberts, Prathiba Rohit, Shyam Salim Sainulabdeen, Warwick Sauer, Sathianandan Thayyil Valappil, Paryiappanal Ulahannan Zacharia, E. Ingrid van Putten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 27% |
| South Africa | 2 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 249 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 56 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 70 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 72 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,692,510
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#83
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,916
of 308,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.