You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preliminary Efforts Directed Toward the Detection of Craving of Illicit Substances: The iHeal Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Toxicology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13181-011-0200-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward W. Boyer, Rich Fletcher, Richard J. Fay, David Smelson, Douglas Ziedonis, Rosalind W. Picard |
| Abstract |
Many behavioral interventions, whether for the management of chronic pain, overeating, medication adherence, or substance abuse, are ineffective outside of the clinic or office environments in which they are taught. This lack of utility has spawned interest in enabling technologies that are capable of detecting changes in affective state that potentially herald a transition to risky behaviors. We have therefore undertaken the preliminary development of "iHeal", an innovative constellation of technologies that incorporates artificial intelligence, continuous biophysical monitoring, wireless connectivity, and smartphone computation. In its fully realized form, iHeal can detect developing drug cravings; as a multimedia device, it can also intervene as the cravings develop to prevent drug use. This manuscript describes preliminary data related to the iHeal Project and our experience with its use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 19% |
| Psychology | 27 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 26 | 16% |
| Engineering | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2012.
All research outputs
#2,735,040
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#215
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,345
of 247,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.