Comparison of a Countermovement Jump Test and Submaximal Run Test to Quantify the Sensitivity for Detecting Practically Important Changes Within High-Performance Australian Rules Football.

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, January 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter: 9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 47 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 11 X posts from 9 X users, with an upper bound of 27,170 followers.

RT @brookes_oa: .@jrjakeman @brookes_shssw @hls_research & colleagues: a submaximal run test might offer to be a more sensitive monitoring…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @brookes_oa: .@jrjakeman @brookes_shssw @hls_research & colleagues: a submaximal run test might offer to be a more sensitive monitoring…

Reply Repost Favourite

.@jrjakeman @brookes_shssw @hls_research & colleagues: a submaximal run test might offer to be a more sensitive monitoring tool than a countermovement jump test #australianrulesfootball #brookes #oa (US$24.95: https://t.co/UWoRL1tnGM) https://t.co/1ZjT

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @brookes_oa: .@jrjakeman @brookes_shssw @hls_research & colleagues: a submaximal run test might offer to be a more sensitive monitoring…

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 7 additional X posts.