You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brief Report: Sensory Reactivity in Children with Phelan–McDermid Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-016-2754-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. M. Mieses, T. Tavassoli, E. Li, L. Soorya, S. Lurie, A. T. Wang, P. M. Siper, A. Kolevzon |
| Abstract |
Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS), a monogenic form of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), results from deletion or mutation of the SHANK3 gene. Atypical sensory reactivity is now included in the diagnostic criteria for ASD. Examining the sensory phenotype in monogenic forms of ASD, such as PMS, may help identify underlying mechanisms of sensory reactivity. Using the Short Sensory Profile, the current study compared sensory reactivity in 24 children with PMS to 61 children with idiopathic ASD (iASD). Results suggest that children with PMS show more low energy/weak symptoms and less sensory sensitivity as compared to children with iASD. This study is the first to demonstrate differences in sensory reactivity between children with PMS and iASD, helping to refine the PMS phenotype. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,968,983
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,214
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,844
of 301,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#35
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.