You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Derivation and External Validation of a Scoring System for Predicting Fracture Risk After Ischemic Stroke in a Canadian Cohort
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Neurology, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1114 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eric E. Smith, Jiming Fang, Shabbir M. Alibhai, Peter Cram, Angela M. Cheung, Leanne K. Casaubon, Eshita Kapoor, Peter C. Austin, Moira K. Kapral |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 25% |
United States | 5 | 25% |
Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 35% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,357,052
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#1,488
of 5,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,444
of 354,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#45
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.