↓ Skip to main content

Formaldehyde Stress Responses in Bacterial Pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formaldehyde Stress Responses in Bacterial Pathogens
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00257
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan H. Chen, Karrera Y. Djoko, Frédéric J. Veyrier, Alastair G. McEwan

Abstract

Formaldehyde is the simplest of all aldehydes and is highly cytotoxic. Its use and associated dangers from environmental exposure have been well documented. Detoxification systems for formaldehyde are found throughout the biological world and they are especially important in methylotrophic bacteria, which generate this compound as part of their metabolism of methanol. Formaldehyde metabolizing systems can be divided into those dependent upon pterin cofactors, sugar phosphates and those dependent upon glutathione. The more prevalent thiol-dependent formaldehyde detoxification system is found in many bacterial pathogens, almost all of which do not metabolize methane or methanol. This review describes the endogenous and exogenous sources of formaldehyde, its toxic effects and mechanisms of detoxification. The methods of formaldehyde sensing are also described with a focus on the formaldehyde responsive transcription factors HxlR, FrmR, and NmlR. Finally, the physiological relevance of detoxification systems for formaldehyde in bacterial pathogens is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 188 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 53 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 13%
Chemistry 18 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 60 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,251,979
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,720
of 29,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,891
of 313,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#355
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.