You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessment of the accuracy of a Bayesian estimation algorithm for perfusion CT by using a digital phantom
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuroradiology, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00234-013-1237-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Makoto Sasaki, Kohsuke Kudo, Timothé Boutelier, Fabrice Pautot, Soren Christensen, Ikuko Uwano, Jonathan Goodwin, Satomi Higuchi, Kenji Ito, Fumio Yamashita |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 50% |
Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
Researcher | 11 | 20% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 25% |
Engineering | 9 | 16% |
Computer Science | 6 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2016.
All research outputs
#13,767,344
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#615
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,528
of 194,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.