↓ Skip to main content

Bilateral oophorectomy and risk of cancer in African American women

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bilateral oophorectomy and risk of cancer in African American women
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10552-014-0353-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah A. Boggs, Julie R. Palmer, Lynn Rosenberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#1,984
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,978
of 314,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.