You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A prospective study of intakes of zinc and heme iron and colorectal cancer risk in men and women
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10552-011-9839-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xuehong Zhang, Edward L. Giovannucci, Stephanie A. Smith-Warner, Kana Wu, Charles S. Fuchs, Michael Pollak, Walter C. Willett, Jing Ma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#697,457
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#61
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,718
of 128,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.