You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Review: mine tailings in an African tropical environment—mechanisms for the bioavailability of heavy metals in soils
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Geochemistry and Health, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10653-019-00326-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Belinda K. Kaninga, Benson H. Chishala, Kakoma K. Maseka, Godfrey M. Sakala, Murray R. Lark, Andrew Tye, Michael J. Watts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,589,877
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#184
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,396
of 352,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#13
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.