↓ Skip to main content

Variation in Physicians’ Electronic Health Record Documentation and Potential Patient Harm from That Variation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
52 X users

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in Physicians’ Electronic Health Record Documentation and Potential Patient Harm from That Variation
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05025-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genna R. Cohen, Charles P. Friedman, Andrew M. Ryan, Caroline R. Richardson, Julia Adler-Milstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 30 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 34 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#726,139
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#575
of 8,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,851
of 360,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#19
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.