You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of methods for the study of bumble bee movement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Apidologie, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13592-019-00662-3 |
| Authors |
John M. Mola, Neal M. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
| Germany | 3 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
| Scientists | 16 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 42 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,121,815
of 23,848,132 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#29
of 823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,462
of 353,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,848,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.