↓ Skip to main content

MGMT in colorectal cancer: a promising component of personalized treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MGMT in colorectal cancer: a promising component of personalized treatment
Published in
Tumor Biology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13277-016-5014-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Le Zhang, Jing Zeng, Zhaolei Zeng, Fenghua Wang, Deshen Wang, Cui Chen, Cong Li, Xin An, Ruihua Xu, Peng Huang, Yi Ba, Yuhong Li

Abstract

The identification of new, effective drugs is a pressing need in colorectal cancer (CRC) rescue therapy. Data examining O (6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyl transferase (MGMT) and its predictive role in temozolomide (TMZ) treatment in CRC are scarce. In this study, the effect of MGMT status on the cytotoxic sensitivity caused by TMZ was analyzed using cytology proliferation assays in colon cancer cell lines. MGMT protein expression was assessed with immunohistochemistry in 385 patients. Concordance between primary and metastatic sites and the role of MGMT status on survival were statistically analyzed. TMZ sensitivity was significantly affected by the level of MGMT protein expression. Of 385 cases, 13 (3.4 %) demonstrated loss of MGMT expression. However, low MGMT expression levels were significantly more common in signet ring cell carcinomas (p = 0.011). In 111 of 385 cases, the overall concordance of MGMT status between primary tumor and metastatic sites was 66.67 % (κ = 0.271, p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival was significantly different between groups with low or high MGMT expression for the irinotecan-based regimen (p = 0.025), but MGMT protein expression was not observed to be a prognostic factor. In conclusion, MGMT was an important in vitro predictor of TMZ activity in CRC. The rate of MGMT protein loss was low in metastatic CRC patients from China, and MGMT might be more commonly lost in signet ring cell carcinoma. The MGMT status at primary and metastatic sites was consistent, but the power of concordance was poor. Further study into these topics is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,842,329
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#969
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,254
of 300,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#19
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.