You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coronary Artery Calcium Scores of Zero and Establishing the Concept of Negative Risk Factors ∗
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J. Blaha, Ron Blankstein, Khurram Nasir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 25% |
| Brazil | 2 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#837,380
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,116
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,068
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#64
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.