↓ Skip to main content

Program Death 1 Immune Checkpoint and Tumor Microenvironment: Implications for Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Program Death 1 Immune Checkpoint and Tumor Microenvironment: Implications for Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2016
DOI 10.1245/s10434-016-5101-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faiz Gani, Neeraja Nagarajan, Yuhree Kim, Qingfeng Zhu, Lan Luan, Feriyl Bhaijjee, Robert A. Anders, Timothy M. Pawlik

Abstract

Program death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have been identified as potential therapeutic targets for solid and hematologic malignancies. The current study aimed to assess PD-L1 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and relate clinical outcomes to its expression. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were obtained for patients undergoing surgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1991 and 2011. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess PD-L1 expression in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and within the tumor front (TF). Of 54 tumor samples analyzed, 34 stained positive for PD-L1 expression on TAMs (TAMs+), and 39 stained positive for PD-L1 expression on cells within the tumor front (TF+). The TF+ patients were less likely to present with metastatic lymph nodes (N1 patients: 26.7 vs 7.7 %; p = 0.011), whereas all tumors with intrahepatic metastasis failed to demonstrate staining for PD-L1 around the tumor front (p = 0.020). Patients with tumors shown to be TAMs+ were less likely to present with multiple lesions (35.0 vs 8.8 %; p = 0.017). Patients with tumors exhibiting PD-L1 expression around the tumor front demonstrated a worse overall survival than TF patients (p = 0.008). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with tumors staining for PD-L1 in the tumor front had a 59.5 % reduced survival (TF- vs TF+: time ratio, 0.405; 95 % confidence interval, 0.215-0.761; p = 0.005). Expression of PD-L1 was noted among a majority of patients, and PD-L1 expression within the tumor front was associated with a 60 % decreased survival. Future clinical trials are necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-L1 therapies among patients with ICC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Other 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,050,952
of 24,532,617 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,419
of 6,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,667
of 305,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#27
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,532,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.