You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantification of the Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol (DON) in Sorghum Using GC-MS and a Stable Isotope Dilution Assay (SIDA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Analytical Methods, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12161-019-01588-3 |
| Authors |
Nicole McMaster, Bhupendra Acharya, Kim Harich, Jan Grothe, Hillary L. Mehl, David G. Schmale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 30% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,780,573
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#197
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,472
of 361,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.