↓ Skip to main content

Difference between apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI): proportional increase associated with degree of obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep and Breathing, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Difference between apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI): proportional increase associated with degree of obesity
Published in
Sleep and Breathing, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11325-016-1330-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Ernst, M. Bosio, A. Salvado, E. Dibur, C. Nigro, E. Borsini

Abstract

Obesity is one of the main predisposing factors for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) hypopnea syndrome. It has been described that body mass index (BMI) influences the accuracy of oxygen desaturation index (ODI) for the diagnosis of OSA by polysomnography (PSG). We analyzed the relationship between traditional indicators: apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and ODI in a population at high risk for OSA, by respiratory polygraphy (RP) and PSG. This is a retrospective study of 1898 patients with suspicion of OSA, from which 1053 underwent RP and 582 underwent PSG with OSA. We compared results considering gender, age, and degree of obesity. This study included 1333 records of patients with OSA-more than 80 % of whom were overweight or obese. We observed that AHI and ODI increased progressively with obesity grade and said increase was associated with BMI only in men. The evaluation of the agreement between AHI and ODI found a difference between normal weight and obese patients, regardless of gender. Study findings contribute to understand the role of oximetry in the diagnosis of OSA in obese patients. Our results were observed using full PSG and a simplified home method. The correlation between these indicators could improve our clinical interpretation of OSA severity among obese patients when abbreviated tests are used.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 23 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 27 38%