You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘Multimorbidity’: an acceptable term for patients or time for a rebrand?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x704681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn Chew-Graham, Liam O'Toole, Jane Taylor, Chris Salisbury |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 49 | 54% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 26 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 17% |
| Scientists | 14 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 40% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#760,636
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#327
of 4,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,854
of 360,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#16
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.