↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a Physical Activity Intervention for Adults With Brain Impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of a Physical Activity Intervention for Adults With Brain Impairment
Published in
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, July 2016
DOI 10.1177/1545968316632059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly M. Clanchy, Sean M. Tweedy, Stewart G. Trost

Abstract

Individuals with brain impairment (BI) are less active than the general population and have increased risk of chronic disease. This controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a physical activity (PA) intervention for community-dwelling adults with BI. A total of 43 adults with BI (27 male, 16 female; age 38.1 ± 11.9 years; stage of change 1-3) who walked as their primary means of locomotion were allocated to an intervention (n = 23) or control (n = 20) condition. The intervention comprised 10 face-to-face home visits over 12 weeks, including a tailored combination of stage-matched behavior change activities, exercise prescription, community access facilitation, and relapse prevention strategies. The control group received 10 face-to-face visits over 12 weeks to promote sun safety, healthy sleep, and oral health. Primary outcomes were daily activity counts and minutes of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) measured with the ActiGraph GT1M at baseline (0 weeks), postintervention (12 weeks) and follow-up (24 weeks). Between-group differences were evaluated for statistical significance using repeated-measures ANOVA. MVPA for the intervention group increased significantly from baseline to 12 weeks (20.8 ± 3.1 to 31.2 ± 3.1 min/d;P= .01), but differences between baseline and 24 weeks were nonsignificant (20.8 ± 3.1 to 25.3 ± 3.2 min/d;P= .28). MVPA changes for the control group were negligible and nonsignificant. Between-group differences for change in MVPA were significant at 12 weeks (P= .03) but not at 24 weeks (P= .49). The 12-week intervention effectively increased adoption of PA in a sample of community-dwelling adults with BI immediately after the intervention but not at follow-up. Future studies should explore strategies to foster maintenance of PA participation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Master 18 9%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 62 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Psychology 19 9%
Sports and Recreations 14 7%
Neuroscience 11 5%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 73 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,365,885
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#822
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,825
of 354,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#82
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.