You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Temporin L and aurein 2.5 have identical conformations but subtly distinct membrane and antibacterial activities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-47327-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giorgia Manzo, Philip M. Ferguson, Charlotte K. Hind, Melanie Clifford, V. Benjamin Gustilo, Hind Ali, Sukhvinder S. Bansal, Tam T. Bui, Alex F. Drake, R. Andrew Atkinson, J. Mark Sutton, Christian D. Lorenz, David A. Phoenix, A. James Mason |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
United States | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 11% |
Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,635,934
of 24,309,087 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#44,786
of 132,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,577
of 349,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,207
of 3,431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,309,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.