You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biological removal of selenate in saline wastewater by activated sludge under alternating anoxic/oxic conditions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11783-019-1154-z |
Authors |
Yuanyuan Zhang, Masashi Kuroda, Shunsuke Arai, Fumitaka Kato, Daisuke Inoue, Michihiko Ike |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 3 | 27% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,847,776
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering
#54
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,372
of 346,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them