You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Selecting flagships for invertebrate conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-012-0257-7 |
| Authors |
Maan Barua, Daniel J. Gurdak, Riyaz Akhtar Ahmed, Jatin Tamuly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 204 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 49 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,351,323
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#501
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,108
of 171,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.