You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valentina Lorenzoni, Stefania Bellelli, Chiara Caselli, Juhani Knuuti, Stephen Richard Underwood, Danilo Neglia, Giuseppe Turchetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Finland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,663,907
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#777
of 1,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,806
of 355,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.