↓ Skip to main content

Obesity and motor skills among 4 to 6-year-old children in the united states: nationally-representative surveys

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obesity and motor skills among 4 to 6-year-old children in the united states: nationally-representative surveys
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katia Castetbon, Tatiana Andreyeva

Abstract

Few population-based studies have assessed relationships between body weight and motor skills in young children. Our objective was to estimate the association between obesity and motor skills at 4 years and 5-6 years of age in the United States. We used repeated cross-sectional assessments of the national sample from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey-Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) of preschool 4-year-old children (2005-2006; n = 5 100) and 5-6-year-old kindergarteners (2006-2007; n = 4 700). Height, weight, and fine and gross motor skills were assessed objectively via direct standardized procedures. We used categorical and continuous measures of body weight status, including obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 95th percentile) and BMI z-scores. Multivariate logistic and linear models estimated the association between obesity and gross and fine motor skills in very young children adjusting for individual, social, and economic characteristics and parental involvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 46 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 13%
Social Sciences 21 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Psychology 12 7%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 44 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2012.
All research outputs
#8,586,143
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,544
of 3,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,972
of 169,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.