You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
On the impact of online commentary in international criminal law: A vain pursuit of a Socratic ideal?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Leiden Journal of International Law, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1017/s0922156519000414 |
Authors |
Dov Jacobs, Joseph Powderly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 5 | 16% |
United States | 4 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Philippines | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 59% |
Scientists | 11 | 34% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,723,382
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Leiden Journal of International Law
#61
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,147
of 350,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leiden Journal of International Law
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.