You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of a Patient-Centered Behavioral Economics Intervention on Hypertension Control in a Highly Disadvantaged Population: a Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-05269-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin F. Shapiro, Suzanne B. Shu, Noah J. Goldstein, Ronald G. Victor, Craig R. Fox, Chi-Hong Tseng, Sitaram Vangala, Braden K. Mogler, Stewart B. Reed, Estivali Villa, José J. Escarce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Psychology | 13 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,381,926
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,100
of 8,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,243
of 346,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#32
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.