↓ Skip to main content

Building of Academics’ Networks—An analysis based on Causation and Effectuation theory

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Regional Research, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building of Academics’ Networks—An analysis based on Causation and Effectuation theory
Published in
Review of Regional Research, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10037-019-00134-2
Authors

Rhoda Ahoba-Sam, David Charles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 30%
Social Sciences 7 23%
Unspecified 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,750,738
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Review of Regional Research
#4
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,376
of 344,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Regional Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 34 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them