↓ Skip to main content

Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00221-012-3072-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan A. Stevenson, Juliane Krueger Fister, Zachary P. Barnett, Aaron R. Nidiffer, Mark T. Wallace

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 136 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Professor 9 6%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 34%
Neuroscience 19 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Engineering 9 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 22 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,170,310
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#849
of 3,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,567
of 160,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.