You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Clinical Trial Data Sharing Platforms Can Advance the Study of Biomarkers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1073110519876165 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Li, Ida Sim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 83% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 33% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,562,963
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#348
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,927
of 531,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#344
of 823 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 823 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.