↓ Skip to main content

Cross-cultural development of an EORTC questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with testicular cancer: the EORTC QLQ-TC26

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-cultural development of an EORTC questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with testicular cancer: the EORTC QLQ-TC26
Published in
Quality of Life Research, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11136-012-0147-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernhard Holzner, Fabio Efficace, Umberto Basso, Colin D. Johnson, Neil K. Aaronson, Juan I. Arraras, Allan B. Smith, Edward Chow, Anne S. Oberguggenberger, Andrew Bottomley, Hannes Steiner, Luca Incrocci, Johannes M. Giesinger

Abstract

Testicular cancer (TC) is the most common cancer in young men, and its incidence is increasing. The low mortality rate makes quality of life (QOL) an important issue in this patient group. This study aimed to develop a supplementary module of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire to assess TC-specific aspects of QOL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 29%
Psychology 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 31 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,378,788
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#633
of 2,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,389
of 156,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,839 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.