You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Workplace interventions for treatment of occupational asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006308.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul K Henneberger, Jenil R Patel, Gerda J de Groene, Jeremy Beach, Susan M Tarlo, Teake M Pal, Stefania Curti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 81 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 85 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,932,609
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,581
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,632
of 367,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.