↓ Skip to main content

利根川河道沿い三調節池群の洪水調節量の算定

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering), March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
利根川河道沿い三調節池群の洪水調節量の算定
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering), March 2014
DOI 10.2208/jscejhe.69.i_793
Authors

松本 敬司, 福岡 捷二, 須見 徹太郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,142,822
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering)
#2
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,839
of 240,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them