You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standard endoscopy with random biopsies versus narrow band imaging targeted biopsies in Barrett's oesophagus: a prospective, international, randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gut, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300962 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prateek Sharma, Robert H Hawes, Ajay Bansal, Neil Gupta, Wouter Curvers, Amit Rastogi, Mandeep Singh, Matt Hall, Sharad C Mathur, Sachin B Wani, Brenda Hoffman, Srinivas Gaddam, Paul Fockens, Jacques J Bergman |
| Abstract |
White light endoscopy with random biopsies is the standard for detection of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and neoplasia in patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BO). Narrow band imaging (NBI) highlights surface patterns that correlate with IM and neoplasia in BO. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 24% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 54% |
| Engineering | 15 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,077,266
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#2,028
of 6,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,916
of 247,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.