You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Remote estimation of rice LAI based on Fourier spectrum texture from UAV image
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0507-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bo Duan, Yating Liu, Yan Gong, Yi Peng, Xianting Wu, Renshan Zhu, Shenghui Fang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 24% |
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,332,207
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#812
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,129
of 364,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#29
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.