You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Septal Versus Lateral Mitral Isthmus Ablation for Treatment of Mitral Annular Flutter
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.014 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ankit Maheshwari, Yasuhiro Shirai, Matthew C Hyman, Jeffrey S Arkles, Pasquale Santangeli, Robert D Schaller, Gregory E Supple, Saman Nazarian, David Lin, Sanjay Dixit, David J Callans, Francis E Marchlinski, David S Frankel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 40% |
Brazil | 2 | 8% |
Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
Cuba | 1 | 4% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 8 | 29% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 43% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,163,154
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#515
of 1,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,883
of 377,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#18
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.