↓ Skip to main content

Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
327 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4357-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Via, G. Tavazzi, S. Price

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 327 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 266 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 42 16%
Researcher 40 15%
Student > Postgraduate 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 73 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Unspecified 2 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 83 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#198,977
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#145
of 5,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,540
of 314,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#3
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.