You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
New insulin delivery devices and glycemic outcomes in young patients with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1171-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tiago Jeronimo Dos Santos, Juan de Mata Donado Campos, Cristina Alexandra Fraga Medin, Jesús Argente, Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 36 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 36 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#13,080,059
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,375
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,905
of 364,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#44
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.