↓ Skip to main content

Ganxi's Consequences: Personal Gains at Social Cost

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ganxi's Consequences: Personal Gains at Social Cost
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, July 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1016021706308
Authors

Ying Fan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 50 44%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 12%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,338
of 3,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,877
of 47,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.