↓ Skip to main content

Angiotensin receptor blockers for heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angiotensin receptor blockers for heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003040.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Balraj S Heran, Vijaya M Musini, Ken Bassett, Rod S Taylor, James M Wright

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (HF) is a prevalent world-wide. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely prescribed for chronic HF although their role is controversial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 11 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 60 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 64 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,717,379
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,360
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,005
of 175,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.