You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interoperability and Considerations for Standards-Based Exchange of Medical Images: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10278-019-00294-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kenneth R. Persons, Jason Nagels, Chris Carr, David S. Mendelson, Henri “Rik” Primo, Bernd Fischer, Matthew Doyle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 54% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 9 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 22 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,795,145
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#102
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,760
of 480,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.