You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sterile carbon particle suspension vs India ink for endoscopic tattooing of colonic lesions: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10151-019-02101-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Milone, A. Vignali, M. Manigrasso, N. Velotti, G. Sarnelli, G. Aprea, G. De Simone, F. Maione, N. Gennarelli, U. Elmore, G. D. De Palma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,538,720
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#983
of 1,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,247
of 362,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#33
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.