You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metagenomic identification of severe pneumonia pathogens in mechanically-ventilated patients: a feasibility and clinical validity study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12931-019-1218-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Libing Yang, Ghady Haidar, Haris Zia, Rachel Nettles, Shulin Qin, Xiaohong Wang, Faraaz Shah, Sarah F. Rapport, Themoula Charalampous, Barbara Methé, Adam Fitch, Alison Morris, Bryan J. McVerry, Justin O’Grady, Georgios D. Kitsios |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,749,194
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,762
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,802
of 474,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#51
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.