↓ Skip to main content

Neuraxial anesthesia and bladder dysfunction in the perioperative period: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuraxial anesthesia and bladder dysfunction in the perioperative period: a systematic review
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12630-012-9717-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Choi, Padraig Mahon, Imad T. Awad

Abstract

Urinary retention requiring catheterization carries the risk of infection. Neuraxial anesthesia causes transient impairment of bladder function ranging from delayed initiation of micturition to frank urinary retention. We undertook a review of the literature to determine the elements of neuraxial anesthesia and analgesia that prolong bladder dysfunction and increase the incidence of urinary retention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Other 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2021.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,997
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,355
of 175,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.