You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Which coordinate system for modelling path integration?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Theoretical Biology, December 2009
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.11.021 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert J. Vickerstaff, Allen Cheung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Germany | 3 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 83 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 31% |
Researcher | 23 | 24% |
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Professor | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 29% |
Neuroscience | 15 | 16% |
Computer Science | 13 | 14% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#1,207
of 4,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,163
of 177,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.