You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chlamydia screening in England: a qualitative study of the narrative behind the policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-317 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Sheringham, Paula Baraitser, Ian Simms, Graham Hart, Rosalind Raine |
| Abstract |
The rationale for the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) has been questioned. There has been little analysis, however, of what drove the NCSP's establishment and how it was implemented. Such analysis will help inform the future development of the NCSP. This study used a qualitative, theory-driven approach to evaluate the rationale for the NCSP's establishment and implementation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 24% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,227,456
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,195
of 17,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,295
of 175,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#50
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.