You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changing Clinical Practice Through Patient Specific Reminders Available at the Time of the Clinical Encounter: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2025-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim A. Holt, Margaret Thorogood, Frances Griffiths |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,697,690
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,718
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,889
of 159,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.