↓ Skip to main content

Stem cell gene therapy: the risks of insertional mutagenesis and approaches to minimize genotoxicity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers of Medicine, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stem cell gene therapy: the risks of insertional mutagenesis and approaches to minimize genotoxicity
Published in
Frontiers of Medicine, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11684-011-0159-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuanfeng Wu, Cynthia E. Dunbar

Abstract

Virus-based vectors are widely used in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy, and have the ability to integrate permanently into genomic DNA, thus driving long-term expression of corrective genes in all hematopoietic lineages. To date, HSC gene therapy has been successfully employed in the clinic for improving clinical outcomes in small numbers of patients with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID-X1), adenosine deaminase deficiency (ADA-SCID), adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), thalassemia, chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS). However, adverse events were observed during some of these HSC gene therapy clinical trials, linked to insertional activation of proto-oncogenes by integrated proviral vectors leading to clonal expansion and eventual development of leukemia. Numerous studies have been performed to understand the molecular basis of vector-mediated genotoxicity, with the aim of developing safer vectors and lower-risk gene therapy protocols. This review will summarize current information on the mechanisms of insertional mutagenesis in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells due to integrating gene transfer vectors, discuss the available assays for predicting genotoxicity and mapping vector integration sites, and introduce newly-developed approaches for minimizing genotoxicity as a way to further move HSC gene therapy forward into broader clinical application.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 138 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 24%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,520,826
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Medicine
#61
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,514
of 245,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them