↓ Skip to main content

Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Polymorphism rs2660753 Is Not Associated with Invasive Ovarian Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Polymorphism rs2660753 Is Not Associated with Invasive Ovarian Cancer
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2011
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernest K. Amankwah, Linda E. Kelemen, Qinggang Wang, Honglin Song, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jonathan Beesley, Penelope M. Webb, Celeste L. Pearce, Anna H. Wu, Malcolm C. Pike, Daniel O. Stram, Jenny Chang-Claude, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Roberta B. Ness, Ellen L. Goode, Julie M. Cunningham, Brooke L. Fridley, Robert A. Vierkant, Shelley S. Tworoger, Alice S. Whittemore, Valerie McGuire, Weiva Sieh, Simon A. Gayther, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Usha Menon, Susan J. Ramus, Mary Anne Rossing, Jennifer A. Doherty, Marc T. Goodman, Michael E. Carney, Galina Lurie, Lynne R. Wilkens, Susanne Krüger Kjær, Estrid Høgdall, Daniel W. Cramer, Kathryn L. Terry, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Hannah Yang, Jolanta Lissowska, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Andrew Berchuck, Paul D.P. Pharoah

Abstract

We previously reported an association between rs2660753, a prostate cancer susceptibility polymorphism, and invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC; OR = 1.2, 95% CI=1.0-1.4, P(trend) = 0.01) that showed a stronger association with the serous histological subtype (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1-1.5, P(trend) = 0.003).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 6%
Belgium 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Professor 4 22%
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Mathematics 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,297,754
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#2,056
of 4,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,245
of 122,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.