You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-019-3838-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aisha Shafayat, Emese Csipke, Lucy Bradshaw, Georgina Charlesworth, Florence Day, Phuong Leung, Esme Moniz-Cook, Alan A. Montgomery, Steve Morris, Gail Mountain, Reuben Ogollah, Kirsty Sprange, Lauren Yates, Martin Orrell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#17,730,887
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,305
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,247
of 482,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them