↓ Skip to main content

Amino acid substitutions [K16A] and [K28A] distinctly affect amyloid β-protein oligomerization

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Physics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 297)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amino acid substitutions [K16A] and [K28A] distinctly affect amyloid β-protein oligomerization
Published in
Journal of Biological Physics, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10867-016-9417-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matjaž žganec, Nicholas Kruczek, Brigita Urbanc

Abstract

Amyloid β-protein (A β) assembles into oligomers that play a seminal role in Alzheimer's disease (AD), a leading cause of dementia among the elderly. Despite undisputed importance of A β oligomers, their structure and the basis of their toxicity remain elusive. Previous experimental studies revealed that the [K16A] substitution strongly inhibits toxicity of the two predominant A β alloforms in the brain, A β 40 and A β 42, whereas the [K28A] substitution exerts only a moderate effect. Here, folding and oligomerization of [A16]A β 40, [A28]A β 40, [A16]A β 42, and [A28]A β 42 are examined by discrete molecular dynamics (DMD) combined with a four-bead implicit solvent force field, DMD4B-HYDRA, and compared to A β 40 and A β 42 oligomer formation. Our results show that both substitutions promote A β 40 and A β 42 oligomerization and that structural changes to oligomers are substitution- and alloform-specific. The [K28A] substitution increases solvent-accessible surface area of hydrophobic residues and the intrapeptide N-to-C terminal distance within oligomers more than the [K16A] substitution. The [K16A] substitution decreases the overall β-strand content, whereas the [K28A] substitution exerts only a modest change. Substitution-specific tertiary and quaternary structure changes indicate that the [K16A] substitution induces formation of more compact oligomers than the [K28A] substitution. If the structure-function paradigm applies to A β oligomers, then the observed substitution-specific structural changes in A β 40 and A β 42 oligomers are critical for understanding the structural basis of A β oligomer toxicity and correct identification of therapeutic targets against AD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 32%
Chemistry 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,711,748
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Physics
#11
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,911
of 298,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Physics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them